Understanding Git Branching Strategies: Merge, Rebase, and Squash
Written on
Chapter 1: Overview of Git Branching Strategies
Git offers several commands to merge changes from one branch to another. While these commands are common in software development, even experienced developers might not fully grasp the nuances or the best practices for various scenarios. This section delves into the distinctions between merge, rebase, and squash, along with their respective applications, advantages, and disadvantages.
Section 1.1: Git Merge
The git merge command is used to integrate changes from two branches into a single branch. When a branch is merged into another, Git creates a new commit that links the histories of both branches.
For instance, consider two branches: main and feature.
- The main branch consists of commits A, B, and C.
- The feature branch consists of commits D, E, and F.
D---E---F (feature)
/
A---B---C (main)
To merge the feature branch into main, you would execute:
git checkout main
git merge feature
After performing these commands, the commit history will appear as follows:
D---E---F (feature)
/
A---B---C---G (main)
Here, commit G represents the merge commit that consolidates the changes from both branches. This commit has at least two parent commits, allowing for a view of the divergent history that eventually converges.
Advantages:
- Preserves the entire commit history of both branches.
- Provides a clear record of the merge points.
- Is non-destructive, leaving existing branches unchanged, thus making it a safe integration option.
Disadvantages:
- Can result in a more complex commit history with numerous merge commits, making navigation challenging.
Section 1.2: Git Rebase
The git rebase command allows you to take the commits from one branch and apply them onto another branch’s tip. This process re-bases the entire source branch to begin on the target branch's latest commit, resulting in a linear commit history.
Using the same branches as before:
D---E---F (feature)
/
A---B---C (main)
To rebase the feature branch onto main, run:
git checkout feature
git rebase main
After executing these commands, the commit history will be:
A---B---C---D'---E'---F' (main)
(feature)
In this case, D', E', and F' are the rebased versions of the original commits.
Advantages:
- Produces a cleaner, linear commit history without extra merge commits.
- Simplifies understanding the project’s development over time.
- Often used before making a pull request to ensure the feature branch can be directly applied on top of the main branch.
Disadvantages:
- Alters the commit history, which may create issues if changes have already been pushed to a remote repository.
- Can be risky for shared branches due to potential overwrites of others' contributions.
- Conflict resolution during a rebase may be more complicated than during a merge.
Section 1.3: Git Squash
The git squash command isn't a standalone command but a combination of git merge and git rebase with the --squash option. It enables the merging of multiple commits into a single commit.
Using the same branches once more:
D---E---F (feature)
/
A---B---C (main)
To implement the squash approach, you would execute:
git checkout main
git merge --squash feature
git commit -m "Squashed commit message"
After these commands, the commit history for the main branch will look like:
A---B---C---G' (main)
Commit G' encapsulates the combined changes from commits D, E, and F on the feature branch.
Advantages:
- Maintains a clean, linear commit history on the target branch.
- Allows for the consolidation of multiple commits into a single, descriptive commit message.
Disadvantages:
- Individual commit history from the merged branch is lost.
- May complicate future reverts or cherry-picking specific changes.
Chapter 2: Choosing the Right Approach
The decision to use merge, rebase, or squash is shaped by personal and team preferences, project requirements, and specific circumstances. Here are some recommendations:
- Use `git merge` when:
- You want to preserve the complete commit histories of both the feature and main branches, especially in public branches.
- You are uncertain about the implications of rewriting commit history.
- Use `git rebase` when:
- You’ve been working on a feature branch for a while and the main branch has progressed. Rebasing helps integrate your work with the latest changes, potentially avoiding conflicts.
- You aim for a clean, linear commit history.
- You need to assimilate upstream changes into your feature branch.
- Use `git squash` when:
- You’ve made several minor commits on your feature branch and wish to produce a clear, concise commit message for the main branch, simplifying code reviews.
- You want to maintain a clean, linear commit history and detailed commit history is less critical.
Ultimately, maintaining consistency within your team is vital. Establishing guidelines and best practices for using these commands can help prevent conflicts and ensure a coherent project history.
The first video, "How to Close a Pull Request - Merge Commit vs Squash vs Rebase on GitHub," offers insights on managing pull requests using various strategies.
The second video, "Git MERGE vs REBASE: Everything You Need to Know," provides a comprehensive understanding of the differences between merge and rebase strategies in Git.