Exploring the Interconnectedness of Reality and Perception
Written on
Chapter 1: The Triadic Nature of Reality
The relationship within reality can be understood as a triadic dynamic that incorporates the mirrored aspect of negation, which signifies the unity of opposites. This reflective quality transforms Secondness, giving rise to Firstness and fueling the momentum of Thirdness. This process is self-creating, or autopoietic. Love, as we perceive it, serves as the vital, life-affirming expression of the Whole. In this context, love is recognized as a positive force, nurturing life and promoting the vitality of the living, self-sustaining system, thereby preventing stagnation. Consequently, it seeks to generate more love, acting as a catalyst for procreation.
Section 1.1: The Nature of Destruction
While it is feasible to obliterate a physical object, attempting to eradicate something non-material, such as a sign or symbol, often produces the opposite effect. Increased observation leads to greater cognitive dissemination and entrenchment, illustrating the concept of Thirdness.
Subsection 1.1.1: The Complexity of Matter and Force
Section 1.2: The Role of Semiosis
In scientific discourse, the term 'matter' is invariably paired with a specifying modifier, which varies depending on the particular field and context. This description is ever-evolving and lacks a definitive explanation of its essence. The same holds true for the term 'force'; both are abstract concepts that only gain meaning through their respective contexts.
Chapter 2: The Dynamics of Perception
The process of semiosis initiates Firstness, which propels our perception of time forward. This phenomenon explains why our memories often consist of recollections of previous memories, stemming from a chain of semiotic causation. As we are all manifestations of the Whole, our actions resonate with one another, forming interconnected influences (nominalism disrupts this unity). Consider the metaphor of retinal blind spots and the analogy of the blind man and the elephant.
Section 2.1: The Observer Effect
When considering the observer effect, a narrow slit can obstruct the chain of semiosis, hindering our ability to perceive both past and future. Again, think about the concept of a retinal blind spot.
Subsection 2.1.1: Inversion and Unity
The inversion of Secondness, akin to turning a glove inside out to fit the opposite hand, illustrates the autopoietic folding of reality, intertwining space and time. This reflects the unity of opposites as highlighted by Heraclitus; the path upwards is mirrored by the path downwards.
Section 2.2: The Nature of Perception
Our perceptions arise from the amalgamation of memories (drawing from our cognitive map) shaped by semiotic causality, leading to the emergence of physical sensations and cognitive judgments through the recognition and evaluation of contrasts. This process emphasizes prehensions over abstractions and utilizes abductive reasoning. Such dynamics are intrinsic to the Whole as it operates in an autopoietic manner, alongside its various expressed forms.
Chapter 3: The Fragility of Continuity
The inversion of physicality and Secondness relies on the existence of the 'other' (dimensional). Much like a three-dimensional drawing depends on two dimensions, which in turn rely on one dimension, the causality of semiosis maintains cohesion that nominalism disrupts. The integrity of our understanding is preserved through semiotic causality, or Universal Mind Cognition. However, the fragmentation caused by nominalism undermines continuity and integrity.
Section 3.1: Entropy as a Balancing Mechanism
An increase in entropy serves as a balancing mechanism within autopoiesis, contributing to thermodynamic energy flow. The dynamic nature of an open system fosters creativity and prevents stagnation. A non-equilibrium state generates momentum for the unfolding and folding of reality, leading to the emergence of creative complexity.
All these reflections illustrate the non-linear, blossoming essence of reality, akin to a kaleidoscope, as discussed in my work "Explorations in Synechism: Nature Rarer Uses Yellow." The reductive and fragmentary approach of nominalism, rooted in linear thinking and the nominalist God of theology, dissects the integrity of reality's cognitive processes, akin to the synapses of Universal Mind.