Exploring the Efficacy of Virtual Hugs in Today's Digital Society
Written on
Chapter 1: Understanding Digital Hugs
The effectiveness of virtual hugs raises intriguing questions. According to Mark James, a post-doctoral researcher at the Okinawa Institute of Science & Technology in Japan, the success of these digital gestures relies heavily on skillful execution. The COVID-19 pandemic prompted him to delve deeper into the nuances of this paradoxical form of interaction. Remarkably, even without a physical embrace, the sentiment behind a hug can still resonate.
James, alongside co-author John Francis Leader from University College Dublin, analyzed over 2,000 personal accounts detailing life during the pandemic's initial wave. While many individuals praised technology for preserving social connections during lockdowns, it was not universally beneficial.
The researchers discovered that technology alone did not dictate emotional outcomes. “The context of interactions—what transpired before, during, and after—plays a crucial role in shaping online social experiences,” James noted. He emphasized that effective digital communication is characterized by employing the appropriate skills at the right moment, fostering a sense of connection, care, and meaning in virtual environments. Their findings are encapsulated in their paper titled “Do digital hugs work? Re-embodying our social lives online with digital tact,” published in Frontiers in Psychology on August 9, 2023.
Section 1.1: The Concept of Digital Tact
The authors introduced the term "digital tact," which they argue is essential for effective virtual hugs. Individuals who master this skill are mindful that the person on the other end has their own feelings and needs, which may differ from their own. James illustrates the absence of tact: “You can easily detect a lack of tact when someone is multitasking during a conversation, such as washing dishes.”
Subsection 1.1.1: The Mixed Reality Interaction Matrix
The research team utilized the Mixed Reality Interaction Matrix (MRIM) to differentiate between in-person and online hugs. This framework includes three reality conditions—physical, virtual, and imaginary—and three interaction dimensions—extrapersonal, intrapersonal, and interpersonal—resulting in nine categories that collectively illustrate the spectrum of "hugginess."
Despite successfully translating every aspect of a real hug to a digital format, the physical and interpersonal component remains absent. However, this lack is not necessarily detrimental; “Individuals who amplify other interaction components can somewhat offset the absence of physical touch,” James clarifies.
Section 1.2: Future Implications
The MRIM serves as a foundational tool for further exploring how to replicate the comforting essence of a genuine hug. According to the researcher, “Having such a framework enables us to identify which components are most significant to the experience, aiding our understanding of subjective interactions.”
These insights could greatly benefit filmmakers, game developers, remote workers' well-being, and online educators. While subjective accounts from the pandemic helped shape the theoretical MRIM for hugs, the next phase involves rigorous testing of these ideas. Personally, I look forward to a series of intriguing experiments.
Chapter 2: The Digital Hug Trend
The first video showcases the viral Hug Trend, providing a tutorial on how to participate in this heartwarming digital phenomenon.
The second video features a professional cuddler who discusses their unique job, revealing that they can earn up to $100 an hour by providing the comforting experience of a hug.