Religion: A Misguided Form of Play
Written on
Chapter 1: The Essence of Play and Its Role in Life
Play serves a fundamental purpose in human existence, as noted by Peter Gray, a researcher and psychology professor at Boston College. He argues that play instills meaning in our lives, aiding us in navigating the complexities of our reality. Initially, this assertion may seem counterproductive, especially in a world largely governed by utilitarian principles where actions are often pursued for ulterior motives.
However, upon deeper contemplation, one can appreciate Gray's perspective. Play, in its truest form, is an activity engaged in for its own enjoyment, devoid of external objectives or rewards. It is a pursuit of joy for joy's sake.
Aristotle highlighted a similar dilemma: if our lives consist solely of activities undertaken for the sake of achieving other goals, then true satisfaction is perpetually postponed. For life to possess intrinsic value, there must be activities that are meaningful in their own right—activities that resonate with the essence of play.
The quest for meaning in life is a shared characteristic of both play and religion, suggesting a profound connection between the two. Johan Huizinga's assertion that human civilization is fundamentally rooted in play, coupled with the enduring presence of religion through history, leads us to contemplate whether religion itself can be construed as a form of play.
We will delve into various aspects that support this idea, including the playful nature of hunter-gatherers, the role of make-believe in both play and religion, the boundaries established in both practices, and their mutual reliance on protective environments against adversity.
Hunter-Gatherers: The Playful Foundations of Religion
The origins of play can be traced back to hunter-gatherer societies. In her work, "Evolution, Early Experience, and Human Development," Darcia Narvaez highlights that playfulness permeated every facet of these communities, particularly within their polytheistic and whimsical religions. Their rituals, characterized by music, dance, and costumes, mirror our contemporary understanding of play.
Despite the modern connotations of the term 'ritual,' these practices were far from rigid or lacking creativity. Richard Gould, in his book "Yiwara," suggests that these rituals can be viewed as playful interactions with elements of nature, personified as deities. Given that religion emerged from this era of playfulness, it seems reasonable to argue that religion itself embodies elements of play.
Make-Believe in Play and Religion
Connor Wood, in an article from "Science on Religion," states that a game—and its accompanying imaginary world—only exists when participants actively engage with their roles. This concept extends to religion, where adherents must 'perform' their roles and follow specific guidelines to conjure an alternate reality.
Behavior in religious environments often diverges markedly from everyday conduct, and the expectations placed upon individuals are typically stringent. This necessary suspension of disbelief aligns both play and religion, as participants must fully immerse themselves in a fabricated reality.
However, it is crucial to recognize that the abundance of make-believe in religion should not be dismissed as mere falsehood. While some make-beliefs may seem incorrect, others can hold significant truth. The essence of make-believe is not the absence of existence but the engagement of one's entire being with a thought, allowing for personal transformation and deeper understanding.
Isolated Spaces and Boundaries in Play and Religion
Both play and religion establish distinct boundaries. Anthropologist Mary Douglas argues that maintaining these boundaries is central to any religious framework. For instance, dietary restrictions in certain religions are not merely personal choices but are deeply rooted in cultural practices, emphasizing the importance of community standing.
In play, boundaries often manifest as spatial and temporal constraints. Sports, like soccer, require designated times and spaces, creating a clear distinction between the game and everyday life. Similarly, places of worship offer a sanctuary from the mundane, allowing for a focused, communal experience.
The Enlightenment showcased the separation of religion from daily thought, highlighting how religion often exists in an isolated bubble, distinct from practical life. This compartmentalization of experiences—work, play, religion, and education—echoes the boundaries inherent in both play and religious practices.
Dependence on Insulation Against Adversity
Just as animals engage in play when they are free from danger, humans tend to partake in play only when they feel relatively secure. In times of immediate concern, play is often set aside, with the opposite of play being work rather than mere seriousness.
Despite the often serious nature of religious activities, they remove individuals from immediate concerns, focusing instead on abstract anxieties. This may seem contradictory, as many of the most religious individuals often face dire circumstances. However, religion can offer a perceived insulation against adversity, providing solace amidst turmoil.
For instance, during conflicts, promises of safety and eternal bliss may serve as a psychological buffer against the harsh realities of war. Thus, religion may be viewed as a grand, life-long game, where narratives, beliefs, and rituals help individuals navigate their realities, allowing for creativity and adaptation.
As societies evolve, so too does religion, reflecting the changing values and structures of humanity. The playful nature of early religious practices highlights the importance of maintaining this spirit within contemporary religious frameworks.
Ultimately, recognizing religion as a form of play does not diminish its significance. Instead, it emphasizes the importance of play in our lives, suggesting that a harmonious blend of the sacred and the playful can enhance our existence and foster a more vibrant world.
Want More?
Join over 3,000 fellow seekers as we explore and expand our understanding of existence.
George Carlin humorously critiques the absurdities of religion, highlighting its often playful yet serious nature.
A spoken word piece articulating the tension between love for Jesus and criticism of organized religion, showcasing the playfulness of belief.