The Evolution of Social Media: Threads and Twitter Dynamics
Written on
Chapter 1: The Complementary Nature of Threads and Twitter
The emergence of Threads does not signify the end of Twitter but rather serves to enhance it. While technology itself does not evoke emotions, it's the perceptions and beliefs of individuals regarding their circumstances that shape their feelings.
Mark Zuckerberg and Elon Musk's rivalry appears to be more of a media spectacle than a genuine feud. It seems they are leveraging this competition to distract from Elon’s challenges while gradually nudging users toward paid social media features. This strategy reinforces the notion that users will eventually have to pay for basic services, regardless of the platform they choose.
Currently, Threads is gaining traction against Twitter. Should it maintain this momentum and later introduce a subscription model, users may willingly pay if they appreciate the brand. Elon Musk's prior attempts to monetize Twitter's basic functions were met with negative public relations, demonstrating a misstep in understanding consumer behavior.
It’s often forgotten that luxury, when enjoyed for a time, can turn into a necessity. Abruptly charging for services that were once free can lead to backlash among users. New tech companies frequently overlook foundational marketing principles.
The essence of branding lies in upholding commitments; failing to do so can lead to customer attrition, much like Elon’s shift in Twitter’s core values. Many tech companies seem to be recognizing this, especially in light of recent economic challenges and job losses.
Section 1.1: The Journey to Profitability
Initially, it was believed that tech companies would require a decade or two to become profitable, as this is the time needed to integrate user behaviors into society. This theory has proven correct. With millions of users on social media, the platform’s design significantly enhances user interactions.
Threads is strategically positioning itself with over 100 million users in less than a year. What is Zuckerberg’s approach?
KINDNESS! Not only is he aiming to foster a space for engagement, but he also seeks to cultivate a safe environment, recognizing that Twitter has struggled with this. Given that cancel culture largely originated on Twitter, it will be interesting to observe how Threads upholds its commitment to kindness, especially during significant social and economic events.
Will users on Threads eventually begin to silence dissenting opinions?
Section 1.2: Branding and User Comfort
The tech industry has taken decades to make users comfortable with their platforms. Musk underestimated the challenge of transitioning users from a free model to a paid one, forgetting the basic principles of the sales funnel.
If it takes years to cultivate brand awareness, it will similarly require time for social media to evolve from a necessity into a status symbol. This transformation involves years of crafting online communities perceived as more valuable based on their presentation.
Strangely enough, China is already implementing social behavior scores to bestow privileges on certain citizens while denying them to others. However, such practices have not yet fully permeated Western nations, as behavior integration is a gradual process.
Subsection 1.2.1: Defining Kindness
Moreover, the concept of kindness is complex. While there is a broad understanding of it, how does it apply in the context of diverse groups, such as the LGBTQ+ community or organizations like The Proud Boys?
For social media platforms to monetize effectively, they must provide a personalized experience for users. Twitter could have benefited from LinkedIn’s approach by maintaining value in its free offerings while allowing users to pay for enhanced features.
Musk’s strategy has not only harmed sales but also alienated many low-income users, who are integral to the platform's value. Supporting the economic well-being of your user community is essential for mutual growth.
Chapter 2: New Approaches to Community Building
I believe it’s time to stop attributing negative feelings toward social media to the platforms themselves. Technology alone does not dictate emotions; rather, it’s the beliefs people hold about their circumstances that do.
Social media amplifies these feelings since users actively choose to create or consume content that resonates with their current emotions.
To foster a vibrant and engaging community, it’s crucial to run both digital and offline marketing initiatives. Numerous companies are already blending remote and in-person work models for their teams.
For instance, while writing a blog post about a beneficial side hustle idea for young adults is valuable, collaborating with brand ambassadors to engage directly with college students and inviting subject matter experts to bolster loyalty is a different level of engagement.
The dynamic of consumers becoming producers and vice versa will likely reshape communities, fostering deeper connections between consumers and content creators. This approach also offers a quicker path to profitability without compromising the intricacies of genuine relationships with customers.
I foresee many new businesses allowing consumers to contribute personal ideas that align with the company’s brand and product offerings, supplemented by AI and other resources. Blogs may evolve into comprehensive content libraries tailored for specific users, with data scientists analyzing them to generate new product ideas.
The influence of the Internet of Things may inspire this evolution, but as the Internet of People grows increasingly chaotic, it will be intriguing to see how Threads addresses these challenges while fulfilling its promises.
If you found this content engaging, click the link below to subscribe to my email for updates.
Not a Medium Member? Join today by following the link below!