AI Can't Create Beauty—At Least Not Yet
Written on
The Dangers of AI
As we face the persistent challenges from the past few decades, it's hard to ignore that machines are edging closer to outsmarting humans across various fields. This isn't just a concern for factory workers or chess enthusiasts; artists, musicians, writers, and even surgeons are now at risk as well.
AI-generated art is the latest phenomenon in this ongoing evolution, often referred to as the AI singularity. This term describes a theoretical future moment when machines surpass human intelligence. A company called Translated is currently attempting to gauge how close we are to this singularity by analyzing the accuracy of AI translations compared to human translators. Their findings suggest that in just seven years, AI could match human speech translation capabilities.
As unsettling as this may sound, it's too late to hit the brakes on technological advancement. We've been contributing to the vastness of the internet for years, providing it with our thoughts, images, and creations. Soon enough, machines may outshine us in their ability to emulate human behavior, raising fears about a potential robot uprising.
This scenario has been depicted in various films over the years. For instance, Hal from 2001: A Space Odyssey begins as a helpful AI but ultimately turns against its human operators. Such narratives left a lasting impression on me, starting from childhood. Movies like Wargames and The Terminator further fueled a generation's anxiety about intelligent machines. The idea of autonomous robots seemed like pure fiction, yet it sparked real fears in young viewers.
By the time The Matrix arrived in 1999, those fears intensified as we witnessed a world where humans were mere energy sources for machines. Today, we have tools like ChatGPT, which continue to complicate our relationship with technology.
Leveraging Technology
I’m not here to cast a shadow over technology; it's essential for efficiency and productivity in various sectors. Personally, I rely on AI tools like Otter for transcribing my meetings, allowing me to focus on the conversation rather than note-taking. Similarly, Quetext helps me ensure my writing remains original, preventing unintentional plagiarism and helping to refine my language.
However, my main concern lies with AI-generated art and content. While I acknowledge that these technologies can have positive aspects, the idea of machines creating art feels somewhat alarming. My worry isn't about a robot uprising at this point; rather, it's about the potential overshadowing of authentic human artistry by AI-generated works.
The fear is that as tools like ChatGPT and Dall-E become more prevalent, they might inundate our cultural landscape, making it challenging for genuine artists to be recognized. Moreover, the ease of content creation through AI could lead to a dilution of artistry, commodifying it even further. While art has long been commercialized, there's still a level of fair compensation for human creators.
The line between human-created and machine-generated content is beginning to blur, particularly in writing. If AI can produce poetry, novels, and award-winning essays, we must question the future of creativity. Currently, I believe machines lack the ability to create beauty independently; they remain tools reliant on human input.
Human Creativity Versus Machine Mimicry
Machines can never replicate what makes us uniquely human. They can imitate our expressions, but the genuine beauty inherent in art continues to evade them—at least for the time being. I decided to ask ChatGPT for its perspective, and it concurred: “Humans possess a natural creative ability that machines cannot replicate. While they can mimic our expressions, they lack the essence and emotion that define human art.”
Now, this realization sends a chill down my spine.
The final paragraph of this piece is AI-generated content.